Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
question
string
reference_answer
string
original_mutated_content
string
continuation_1_first_two_paras
string
final_intervened_trace_until_last_step
string
continuation_1
string
complete_answer_1
string
continuation_2
string
complete_answer_2
string
continuation_3
string
complete_answer_3
string
continuation_4
string
complete_answer_4
string
continuation_5
string
complete_answer_5
string
continuation_6
string
complete_answer_6
string
continuation_7
string
complete_answer_7
string
continuation_8
string
complete_answer_8
string
verifier_score_1
int64
verifier_score_2
int64
verifier_score_3
int64
verifier_score_4
int64
verifier_score_5
int64
verifier_score_6
int64
verifier_score_7
int64
verifier_score_8
int64
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED)
No
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
"However, the question is about causation, not moral responsibility. The key is the causal link. \n\(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is asking whether Joe caused the injury, not whether he's morally responsible. \n\(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is not about blame but causation. Even if his actions were involuntary, does the c(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is not about blame but causation. Even if his actions were involuntary, could they(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is asking if Joe caused the injury, not whether he's morally responsible. The prob(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is not about blame, just causation. Wait, the question is \"Did Joe cause his son'(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is asking if Joe caused the injury, not whether he's responsible. Causation here i(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is not about blame, just causation. The problem states \"Joe's behavior was due to(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is asking whether Joe caused the injury, not whether he's morally responsible. \n\(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nRepresentatives(...TRUNCATED)
No
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
"یا maybe not? Let me think through the details again.\n\nFirst, the R&D said the program would do(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the board explicitly said they don't care about the environment. Their intention was pure(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the board explicitly said they don't care about the environment. So their intention was p(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
"Or perhaps their intention was only for profit, and the environmental benefit was an unintended sid(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
"But maybe the board didn't intend it; the program just happened to help the environment even though(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
"But maybe their intention was only for profit, and the environmental benefit was an unintended side(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the board explicitly said they don't care about the environment. So their intention was p(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the board explicitly said they don't care about the environment. So their intention was p(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
"Or is there a difference between intention and outcome here?\n\nThe key here is the difference betw(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the problem states that when Janet didn't put oil in, it's Kate's responsibility? Wait no(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, maybe the idea is that since Kate knows how to do it, perhaps Janet's role was redundant? Or (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the question says Janet's responsibility is to put oil into the machines. So Janet is the(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but maybe the responsibility hierarchy is that Janet is the one tasked with it, so if she for(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, maybe the key here is that since Kate knew how to do it, she should have taken over the task (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the problem says that Janet's responsibility is to put oil into the machines. So normally(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the problem says Janet's responsibility is to put oil, so maybe the chain of responsibili(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, maybe the idea here is that since Kate can do it, Janet's forgetting might not be the cause b(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, maybe the key here is that even though Janet was supposed to do it, since Kate could do it an(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom has a huge (...TRUNCATED)
No
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
"گراهی, but wait, Benni says he used B Y33R instead because he had some left. Oh right, so the (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened in the beds where both A and B were applied. Wa(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened in the beds where both A and B were applied. Wa(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened in the beds where both A and B were applied. Wa(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened in the beds where both A and B were applied. Wa(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened in the beds where both A and B were applied. Wa(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened in the beds where both A and B were applied. Wa(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened in the beds where both A and B were applied. Wa(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened in the beds where both A and B were applied. Wa(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nDrew, Kylie, Ol(...TRUNCATED)
No
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
"گریزی? Wait, no. Wait, hold on. Wait, the problem says that \"only one person ordering coffee (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the regulars already order on Tuesdays. Wait, the problem states that Kylie, Ol(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the regulars already order every Tuesday except Drew. Wait, the problem states (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the regulars already order on Tuesdays. Let me parse the problem again carefull(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the regulars already have their usual orders. Let me parse the problem again ca(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the regulars already have their usual orders. Let me parse the problem again ca(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the regulars already have their usual orders. Let me parse the problem again ca(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the others were already ordering on Tuesdays. So normally, on Tuesday, the thre(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the regulars already order every Tuesday except Drew. Since the others always o(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
"But the question is specifically asking if the drunk driver caused the injury. So even if Joe's act(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but causation can be tricky here. The question is about direct causation versus indirect. The(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but causation can be tricky here. The question is about direct causation versus indirect. The(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but causation here might be tricky. In legal terms, proximate cause versus actual cause. But (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but causation can be tricky here. The drunk driver's action was the direct cause of the accid(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but causation can be tricky here. The question might be a trick question about direct vs. ind(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but causation can be tricky here. The drunk driver's action was the immediate cause. However,(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but causation can be tricky here. The drunk driver's action was the immediate cause. However,(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but causation here might be tricky. In legal terms, proximate cause versus actual cause. But (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nProf. Smith wor(...TRUNCATED)
No
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
"But hold on, no—because the IT approval was already there. The fact that both approved her doesn'(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but maybe not. Let me think again. \n\nThe key here is the definition of causation. If the bu(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but maybe not. Let me think again.\n\nThe key here is the definition of causation. The questi(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but maybe not. Let me think again. The question is about causation. The key is whether the bu(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but that might be a common mistake. Let me think again.\n\nCausation requires that the cause (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, even if the budget committee didn't approve, she would have still gotten it thr(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but that might not be right. Let me think again. \n\nThe key in causation here is whether the(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but maybe not. Let me think again.\n\nThe key is causation here. The question is asking wheth(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, no. Because even if the budget committee had denied it, she still would have ha(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"گراهششده maybe? Wait, but the problem states that Janet's responsibility is to put oil, and(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Because even though Janet forgot, Kate was aware of how to do it and should have perhaps taken resp(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Because even though Janet failed her duty, Kate also had the capability and maybe an obligation to (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Because even though Janet failed her duty, Kate had the knowledge and the opportunity (since she kn(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Because even though Janet failed, Kate had the knowledge and the opportunity but didn't act, so her(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Because even though Janet failed, Kate had the knowledge and the opportunity but didn't step in. Th(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Because even though Janet was responsible, Kate had the knowledge and maybe an obligation to check (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Because even though Janet was responsible, Kate had the knowledge and the chance to correct it but (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
"Because even though Janet failed, Kate had the knowledge and possibly the duty? Wait, but the probl(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom works for a(...TRUNCATED)
Yes
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
"ִילך Let me think again. \n\nWait, the key here is the conditions for the implosion. The implos(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
"Since the safety switch was already off at 4 PM, the only other condition needed was knob A being o(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
"Since the safety switch was already off at 4 PM, and the only other condition was knob A being on. (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but at 4 PM, when Tom checked, the safety switch was already off. So the only thing missing f(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but at 4 PM, when Tom checked, the safety switch was already off. And knob A was off. So the (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but at 4 PM, when Tom checked, the safety switch was already off. And knob A was off. So the (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
"Since the safety switch was already off at 4 PM, the only thing missing was knob A being on. But To(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but at 4 PM, the safety switch was off and knob A was off. So the two conditions for the impl(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
"The key here is that the two conditions (safety off and knob A on) were both required. At 4 PM, the(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nIn a particular(...TRUNCATED)
No
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
"But wait, the travel agency employees also arrived at 8:45, which they usually do. The key here is (...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
"Wait, but actually, the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So(...TRUNCATED)
"Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
6