human
Write me a Python code to find the number of permutations p of numbers ranging from 1 to n, for which the sequence a_{p_1}, a_{p_2}, given the following:
A sequence of n non-negative integers (n ≥ 2) a_1, a_2, ..., a_n is called good if for all i from 1 to n-1 the following condition holds true: $$$a_1 \: \& \: a_2 \: \& \: ... \: \& \: a_i = a_{i+1} \: \& \: a_{i+2} \: \& \: ... \: \& \: a_n, where \&$$$ denotes the [bitwise AND operation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operation#AND).

You are given an array a of size n (n ≥ 2). Find the number of permutations p of numbers ranging from 1 to n, for which the sequence a_{p_1}, a_{p_2}, ... ,a_{p_n} is good. Since this number can be large, output it modulo 10^9+7.

Input

The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^4), denoting the number of test cases.

The first line of each test case contains a single integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5) — the size of the array.

The second line of each test case contains n integers a_1, a_2, …, a_n (0 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the elements of the array.

It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases doesn't exceed 2 ⋅ 10^5.

Output

Output t lines, where the i-th line contains the number of good permutations in the i-th test case modulo 10^9 + 7.

Example

Input

4
3
1 1 1
5
1 2 3 4 5
5
0 2 0 3 0
4
1 3 5 1

Output

6
0
36
4

Note

In the first test case, since all the numbers are equal, whatever permutation we take, the sequence is good. There are a total of 6 permutations possible with numbers from 1 to 3: [1,2,3], [1,3,2], [2,1,3], [2,3,1], [3,1,2], [3,2,1].

In the second test case, it can be proved that no permutation exists for which the sequence is good.

In the third test case, there are a total of 36 permutations for which the sequence is good. One of them is the permutation [1,5,4,2,3] which results in the sequence s=[0,0,3,2,0]. This is a good sequence because 

  *  s_1 = s_2 \: \& \: s_3 \: \& \: s_4 \: \& \: s_5 = 0, 
  *  s_1 \: \& \: s_2 = s_3 \: \& \: s_4 \: \& \: s_5 = 0, 
  *  s_1 \: \& \: s_2 \: \& \: s_3 = s_4 \: \& \: s_5 = 0, 
  *  s_1 \: \& \: s_2 \: \& \: s_3 \: \& \: s_4 = s_5 = 0.
assistant
#Here is Python code to find the number of permutations p of numbers ranging from 1 to n, for which the sequence a_{p_1}, a_{p_2}, .

from __future__ import division, print_function
def main():
    from sys import stdin
    input = stdin.readline

    def f(a):
        mod = 10 ** 9 + 7
        bit = a[0]
        for i in a[1:]:
            bit &= i
        a = list(map(lambda s: s - bit, a))
        cntz = a.count(0)
        if cntz == 0:
            return 0
        ans = (cntz * (cntz - 1)) % (mod)  # (cntz C 2)*2  multiplied by 2 for left and right pos
        for i in range(1, len(a) - 1):
            ans = (ans * i) % mod
        return ans

    for i in range(int(input())):
        a = input()
        lst = list(map(int, input().strip().split()))
        print(f(lst))
######## Python 2 and 3 footer by Pajenegod and c1729

# Note because cf runs old PyPy3 version which doesn't have the sped up
# unicode strings, PyPy3 strings will many times be slower than pypy2.
# There is a way to get around this by using binary strings in PyPy3
# but its syntax is different which makes it kind of a mess to use.

# So on cf, use PyPy2 for best string performance.

py2 = round(0.5)
if py2:
    from future_builtins import ascii, filter, hex, map, oct, zip
    range = xrange

import os, sys
from io import IOBase, BytesIO

BUFSIZE = 8192
class FastIO(BytesIO):
    newlines = 0

    def __init__(self, file):
        self._file = file
        self._fd = file.fileno()
        self.writable = "x" in file.mode or "w" in file.mode
        self.write = super(FastIO, self).write if self.writable else None

    def _fill(self):
        s = os.read(self._fd, max(os.fstat(self._fd).st_size, BUFSIZE))
        self.seek((self.tell(), self.seek(0,2), super(FastIO, self).write(s))[0])
        return s

    def read(self):
        while self._fill(): pass
        return super(FastIO,self).read()

    def readline(self):
        while self.newlines == 0:
            s = self._fill(); self.newlines = s.count(b"\n") + (not s)
        self.newlines -= 1
        return super(FastIO, self).readline()

    def flush(self):
        if self.writable:
           ...